Spec SL RE 160 vs Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh: specs compared
Updated 05 September 2026.
400 Wh
Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh wins on battery capacity
On battery capacity, Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh leads: 400 Wh versus 160 Wh.
| Spec | Spec SL RE 160 | Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 160 Wh | 400 Wh |
| Voltage | 36 V nominal (42 V charge) | 36 V |
| Rated capacity | about 4.4 Ah | 11 Ah |
| Form | bottle-cage range extender | integrated in-tube |
| Charge port | Rosenberger / Magcode magnetic charge connector | Yamaha PW-series charge connector |
| Fits | Specialized Turbo Levo SL, Kenevo SL, Vado SL, Como SL and Creo SL bikes | Yamaha 36 V PW-SE, PW-TE, PW-ST and PW-X in-tube bikes |
Questions and answers
Which has the higher battery capacity, Spec SL RE 160 or Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh?
On battery capacity, Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh leads: 400 Wh versus 160 Wh.
How do Spec SL RE 160 and Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh compare?
On battery capacity, Yamaha Intube 400 Wh (400 Wh leads: 400 Wh versus 160 Wh.